First of all, thank you for the interesting work.
I was experimenting the one with patch size 1 and kernel size 9 with CIFAR-10 with the following training settings:
--model tiny_convmixer
-b 64 -j 8
--opt adamw
--epochs 200
--sched onecycle
--amp
--input-size 3 32 32
--lr 0.01
--aa rand-m9-mstd0.5-inc1
--cutmix 0.5
--mixup 0.5
--reprob 0.25
--remode pixel
--num-classes 10
--warmup-epochs 0
--opt-eps 1e-3
--clip-grad 1.0
--scale 0.75 1.0
--weight-decay 0.01
--mean 0.4914 0.4822 0.4465
--std 0.2471 0.2435 0.2616
I could get only 95.89%. I am supposed to get 96.03% according to Table 4 in the paper.
Can you please let me know any setting I missed? Thank you again.
First of all, thank you for the interesting work.
I was experimenting the one with patch size 1 and kernel size 9 with CIFAR-10 with the following training settings:
I could get only 95.89%. I am supposed to get 96.03% according to Table 4 in the paper.
Can you please let me know any setting I missed? Thank you again.